The Great Debate: Nye vs Ham: The Outcome

Just a quick note about the debate.  I love Ken Ham.  He is brilliant.  However, he let the debate be about the age of the Earth and other such lesser issues.  He didn’t effectively challenge “The Science Guy” to account for matter, energy, consciousness, or information (DNA).  The closest thing to a challenge was from an audience question about consciousness.  More later.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to “The Great Debate: Nye vs Ham: The Outcome”

  1. Michael Snow Says:

    Yes, the untenable YEC position is an unnecessary stumbling block. I read some sad comments from young Christians. Ham fails to accept natural revelation as the Bible does–some comments on that by R.C. Sproul and Augustine linked at end here: http://textsincontext.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/in-the-beginning/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: